Why Does the Trade Media Ignore Vote Fraud?
For the most part the liberal media ignored the incredible comments by a District Court Judge Donald Mosley in the recent case involving ACORN and vote fraud. Judge Mosley stated:
"It is making a mockery of our election process. If I had an individual in this courtroom...who was responsible for this kind of thing, I would put that person in prison for 10 years, hard time, and not think twice about it,"
The liberal media and their allies on the left ignore the problems of vote fraud , or worse yet dismiss them as not a problem, The case above in a great example. It involved a bonus system called "blackjack" which at a minimum encouraged and rewarded those who submitted fraudulent registrations.
The system was successful in that purpose and it led to massive numbers of false registrations. ACORN tried to argue that it was an illegal compensation case but Judge Mosley did not accept that argument instead ruling it was an election case and therefore a vote fraud case.
But even worse the individuals who commit vote fraud are in fact rewarded for their behavior. The individual in charge of the blackjack program, Amy Busefink, was promoted to a better position with ACORN's affiliated and officially political program "Project Vote." (A program President Obama cut his political teeth on many years ago.) Amy was put in in charge of the group's national get-out-the-vote drive in 2010.
Vote Fraud deniers will say this case did not involve vote fraud or some such and thus have ignored the judges incredible comments. They obviously don't see a problem as Ms. Busefink is treated as an upcoming star instead of someone who Judge Mosely seemingly would have sentenced to "hard time" if he could.
ACORN knew what it was doing in Nevada and rewarded Ms. Busefink for a job well done. By flooding the system with fraudulent registrations they created chaos which makes it is easier to vote illegally. A good example of this is promoting a person who led a campaign for illegal registrations in charge of get-out-the-vote. While get-out-the-vote is a noble and legitimate activity why would any group promote a person who was attempting to create illegal votes to be in charge of getting out the vote? It begs the question: was she also in charge of getting out the illegal votes in 2010?